14
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 10:
Line 10: + + Line 28:
Line 30: − − :::: I'll raise the quality of my edits and comments when you'll tell me what's wrong with them. You ''still'' haven't told me how I "deleted information" from the Professor values page. But for the moment, I'd appreciate an explanation of how "You haven't stated precisely what the press office his employer actually said" and "We've all seen what the press office said" reconcile. Am I making some terrible critical reading error here? Did you make a typo? Or is your complaint that the edits did not include a quotation of the press office? [[User:Wandering|Wandering]] 19:46, 9 June 2008 (EDT)
no edit summary
::: We've all seen what the press office said, Wandering. Again, you don't raise the quality of your edits and comments soon, your account is going to be blocked. This will remain a quality site.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 19:32, 9 June 2008 (EDT)
::: We've all seen what the press office said, Wandering. Again, you don't raise the quality of your edits and comments soon, your account is going to be blocked. This will remain a quality site.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 19:32, 9 June 2008 (EDT)
:::: I'll raise the quality of my edits and comments when you'll tell me what's wrong with them. You ''still'' haven't told me how I "deleted information" from the Professor values page. But for the moment, I'd appreciate an explanation of how "You haven't stated precisely what the press office his employer actually said" and "We've all seen what the press office said" reconcile. Am I making some terrible critical reading error here? Did you make a typo? Or is your complaint that the edits did not include a quotation of the press office? [[User:Wandering|Wandering]] 19:46, 9 June 2008 (EDT)
:::: I think to "remain a quality site", one must first achieve the status of "being a quality site". --[[User:Jareddr|Jareddr]] 19:39, 9 June 2008 (EDT)
:::: I think to "remain a quality site", one must first achieve the status of "being a quality site". --[[User:Jareddr|Jareddr]] 19:39, 9 June 2008 (EDT)
:::::::::: I agree, they are not going to embarrass Obama, but institutions such as the University of Chicago have their own interests in mind ahead of any individual. They could have easily ignored the situation and not released a press release at all had they known that his claims were incorrect. Saying "woe to anyone who claims on his resume that he's a professor when he was a Senior Lecturer" is not a fact, but an opinion which by Conservapedia's own Commandments (#5) must not have sway in determining what appears in an article. --Aehlinger
:::::::::: I agree, they are not going to embarrass Obama, but institutions such as the University of Chicago have their own interests in mind ahead of any individual. They could have easily ignored the situation and not released a press release at all had they known that his claims were incorrect. Saying "woe to anyone who claims on his resume that he's a professor when he was a Senior Lecturer" is not a fact, but an opinion which by Conservapedia's own Commandments (#5) must not have sway in determining what appears in an article. --Aehlinger