nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
13,818
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 36:
Line 36: + + + +
→Gottschalk
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
I think this small change would satisfy us both, yes?--[[user:TomMoore|<font color="#000066" >Tom Moore</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:TomMoore|fiat justitia ruat coelum]]</sup> 17:36, 6 June 2008 (EDT)
I think this small change would satisfy us both, yes?--[[user:TomMoore|<font color="#000066" >Tom Moore</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:TomMoore|fiat justitia ruat coelum]]</sup> 17:36, 6 June 2008 (EDT)
:Actually Tom, this is the type of thing that I wish to avoid. The number of nobles in Germany, using the word in its loosest form, could not have been fit in a football stadium. But when we use the word, our readers will assume we are talking about men of prestige, renown, and power. The leaders of the peasants' cruade and their positions are unclear, except for such prominent men as Count Emico. Based on the lack of food and general disorganization, it does not match what would be expected if "nobles" (as the word is usually used) are in charge in any type of meaningful way.
:Pogroms is similar. As usually envisioned, it implies a government that is giving either its formal or unspoken consent -- neither of which applies in this case. The word will be misinterpreted. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 03:42, 10 June 2008 (EDT)