| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| | '''Carbon dating''', or carbon-14 dating, is a method for comparing the ages of organic materials such as bones or things made from anything that once lived. | | '''Carbon dating''', or carbon-14 dating, is a method for comparing the ages of organic materials such as bones or things made from anything that once lived. |
| | | | |
| − | The technique is based on comparing the levels of <SUP>14</SUP>C and <SUP>12</SUP>C isotopes in the sample. When the sample was living, the ratio of <SUP>14</SUP>C to <SUP>12</SUP>C in the material is the same as in the atmosphere. But after death the <SUP>14</SUP>C isotope decays into N-14, while <SUP>12</SUP>C does not. The loss in <SUP>14</SUP>C is then used to estimate how long ago the sample died, which is typically the same as how long the sample existed. | + | The technique is based on comparing the levels of <SUP>14</SUP>C and <SUP>12</SUP>C [[isotope]]s in the sample. When the sample was living, the ratio of <SUP>14</SUP>C to <SUP>12</SUP>C in the material is the same as in the atmosphere. But after death the <SUP>14</SUP>C isotope decays into N-14, while <SUP>12</SUP>C does not. The loss in <SUP>14</SUP>C is then used to estimate how long ago the sample died, which is typically the same as how long the sample existed. |
| | | | |
| − | The rate of decay of <SUP>14</SUP>C is such that 50% of the <SUP>14</SUP>C in the sample will decay in 5730 years: 50% of the <SUP>14</SUP>C in the sample is left, after 11460 years 25% will be left, after 17190 years 12.5% will be left, after 50,000 years only about 1/500th of the <SUP>14</SUP>C remains - and since even initially it is only present as a minute proportion of the whole (0.0000000001% of all Carbon atoms)<ref>http://www.enviroliteracy.org/article.php/1006.html</ref>, measuring the exact quantity present accurately enough to be of use for dating purposes is extremely difficult. For this reason, scientists do not generally attempt to carbon date material that is believed to be older than about 50,000-60,000 years old (or for material younger than 150 years old). | + | The rate of [[radioactive decay|decay]] of <SUP>14</SUP>C is such that 50% of the <SUP>14</SUP>C in the sample will decay in 5730 years: 50% of the <SUP>14</SUP>C in the sample is left, after 11460 years 25% will be left, after 17190 years 12.5% will be left, after 50,000 years only about 1/500th of the <SUP>14</SUP>C remains - and since even initially it is only present as a minute proportion of the whole (0.0000000001% of all Carbon atoms)<ref>http://www.enviroliteracy.org/article.php/1006.html</ref>, measuring the exact quantity present accurately enough to be of use for dating purposes is extremely difficult. For this reason, scientists do not generally attempt to carbon date material that is believed to be older than about 50,000-60,000 years old (or for material younger than 150 years old). |
| | | | |
| | [[Image:C-14decay.JPG|framed|The first-order decay curve of carbon-14 based on the half-life of 5730 years. Because of the small amount of <SUP>14</SUP>C remaining after 50,000 years, the rate of decay becomes small.]] | | [[Image:C-14decay.JPG|framed|The first-order decay curve of carbon-14 based on the half-life of 5730 years. Because of the small amount of <SUP>14</SUP>C remaining after 50,000 years, the rate of decay becomes small.]] |
| Line 9: |
Line 9: |
| | == Limits of Carbon Dating == | | == Limits of Carbon Dating == |
| | | | |
| − | First, it had not been proven scientifically whether the rate of decay of <SUP>14</SUP>C has remained constant over hundreds or thousands of years. Some scientists have suggested, based on experimental observations, that the laws of physics do change over time.<ref>"The idea that nature's laws change over time was proposed in the 1930s by one of the titans in the history of physics, Paul Dirac of England. According to Dirac's large numbers hypothesis, the force of gravity changed over time." See Keay Davidson, "Recent study forces scientists to rethink basic law of physics," San Francisco ''Chronicle''[http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2005/05/09/MNG5LCLEU41.DTL]</ref> The "change" discussed here - in a study that is still very controversial - occurred over billions of years, though, and not in the near enough future to have had an effect on the utility of carbon dating (since carbon dating is only useful to date life within the past 50,000 years, only a change within 50,000 years would affect the dating method). | + | First, it had not been proven scientifically whether the rate of decay of <SUP>14</SUP>C has remained constant over hundreds or thousands of years. Some scientists have suggested, based on experimental observations, that the laws of physics do change over time.<ref>"The idea that nature's laws change over time was proposed in the 1930s by one of the titans in the history of physics, [[Paul Dirac]] of England. According to Dirac's large numbers hypothesis, the force of gravity changed over time." See Keay Davidson, "Recent study forces scientists to rethink basic law of physics," San Francisco ''Chronicle''[http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2005/05/09/MNG5LCLEU41.DTL]</ref> The "change" discussed here - in a study that is still very controversial - occurred over billions of years, though, and not in the near enough future to have had an effect on the utility of carbon dating (since carbon dating is only useful to date life within the past 50,000 years, only a change within 50,000 years would affect the dating method). |
| | | | |
| | Second, "various plants have differing abilities to exclude significant proportions of the C-14 in their intake. This varies with environmental conditions as well. The varying rates at which <SUP>14</SUP>C is excluded in plants also means that the apparent age of a living animal may be affected by an animal's diet. An animal that ingested plants with relatively low <SUP>14</SUP>C proportions would be dated older than their true age."<ref>Nondestructive Testing (NDT) Resource Center, "Uncertainty in Carbon Dating"[http://www.ndt-ed.org/EducationResources/CommunityCollege/Radiography/Physics/carbondating.htm]</ref> | | Second, "various plants have differing abilities to exclude significant proportions of the C-14 in their intake. This varies with environmental conditions as well. The varying rates at which <SUP>14</SUP>C is excluded in plants also means that the apparent age of a living animal may be affected by an animal's diet. An animal that ingested plants with relatively low <SUP>14</SUP>C proportions would be dated older than their true age."<ref>Nondestructive Testing (NDT) Resource Center, "Uncertainty in Carbon Dating"[http://www.ndt-ed.org/EducationResources/CommunityCollege/Radiography/Physics/carbondating.htm]</ref> |
| Line 22: |
Line 22: |
| | <references/> | | <references/> |
| | | | |
| − | [[Category:Earth Sciences]] | + | [[Category:Chronology]][[Category:Earth Sciences]] |