Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
196 bytes added ,  02:59, June 12, 2008
And if they flew, they would be birds, surely?
Line 63: Line 63:  
: I had seen the print copy of the New Scientist article, but not the expanded Internet version.  But I reject that it is a "good article", with absolute nonsense being included, such as claiming that the Bible says that the Earth is flat and that the moon generates its own light.  They should be ashamed of having published this rubbish.
 
: I had seen the print copy of the New Scientist article, but not the expanded Internet version.  But I reject that it is a "good article", with absolute nonsense being included, such as claiming that the Bible says that the Earth is flat and that the moon generates its own light.  They should be ashamed of having published this rubbish.
 
: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 23:12, 11 May 2008 (EDT)
 
: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 23:12, 11 May 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
== And if they flew, they would be birds, surely? ==
 +
 +
Not if they were chickens. Or turkeys. Or penguins. Or bats. Or Rocky the Flying Squirrel.[[User:AliceBG|AliceBG]] 22:59, 11 June 2008 (EDT)
543

edits

Navigation menu