Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 319: Line 319:     
:::::Good sir, do you have a source to prove that Marijuana is physically addictive? Furthermore, yes, I saw that he did cocaine-- And to say that someone did cocaine ten times doesn't make sense. At that point they'd be addicted. Your logic is flawed terribly. Furthermore, he made a specific effort to not deny he did cocaine. Your remarks that Obama might be doing cocaine in office are, however, pure speculation. Good day. [[User:DannyRedful|DannyRedful]] 16:41, 13 June 2008 (EDT)
 
:::::Good sir, do you have a source to prove that Marijuana is physically addictive? Furthermore, yes, I saw that he did cocaine-- And to say that someone did cocaine ten times doesn't make sense. At that point they'd be addicted. Your logic is flawed terribly. Furthermore, he made a specific effort to not deny he did cocaine. Your remarks that Obama might be doing cocaine in office are, however, pure speculation. Good day. [[User:DannyRedful|DannyRedful]] 16:41, 13 June 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
::::::Whether or not it is "physically addictive" is not important. It is illegal, immoral, and dangerous. It is also a gateway drug to the hard drugs that are even more dangerous. In Obama's case it led to cocaine. You say someone is addicted to cocaine after doing it 10 times. I don't doubt it.  How many times has Obama done it? Did he get addicted? I don't know, and I didn't put that in the article. But it is something everyone should be concerned about. We don't say that he is secret a Muslim even though he might be because we can't prove it, but we do rightly mention that he went to an Islamic school, and the 57 Islamic states statement so people can decide for themselves. We should also prominently mention his drug use, so people know that he used to do drugs regularly, and they can decide for themselves if they think it did him any long term harm or if they think he still does and will continue to do so. It's a risk people need to know. It's much more important than his lies about his uncle. [[User:TonyT|TonyT]] 17:00, 13 June 2008 (EDT)
    
Tim, I agree with putting it further down the page.  Right now the lead looks bad with all these criticisms.  I agree that it belongs in the article but I think we should make a seperate section for all of this or include it in the relevant sections already there.  We had the same thing on the McCain page.  A lead section full of little criticisms of mistakes in speeches until I removed it.  What do you think? [[User:HenryS|HenryS]] 16:12, 13 June 2008 (EDT)
 
Tim, I agree with putting it further down the page.  Right now the lead looks bad with all these criticisms.  I agree that it belongs in the article but I think we should make a seperate section for all of this or include it in the relevant sections already there.  We had the same thing on the McCain page.  A lead section full of little criticisms of mistakes in speeches until I removed it.  What do you think? [[User:HenryS|HenryS]] 16:12, 13 June 2008 (EDT)
54

edits

Navigation menu