250
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 102:
Line 102: + + + +
no edit summary
All I did was try and explain who David Hicks is.
All I did was try and explain who David Hicks is.
[[User:AdenJ|AdenJ]] 22:40, 14 June 2008 (EDT)
[[User:AdenJ|AdenJ]] 22:40, 14 June 2008 (EDT)
::This was never a quarrel with administration, this was an argument between two users about whether or not those released from Guantanamo returned to the battlefield. We provided numerous examples of cases where [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page&diff=prev&oldid=474273 your statement] was wrong, the most notable being David Hicks. You chose to ignore these and try to shift the debate to one about their innocence before their detention, not afterwards. You threatened to block Aggrieved if he failed to provide supporting evidence, he and others have done so on this page, however you have chosen not to address it.
::Contempt of the administration is when someone actively derides those in charge, not when (s)he has a disagreement with someone who has been granted administrative powers. You want to block me for pointing this out, go ahead. However, keep in mind that at the end of the day the only way this encyclopedia is going to succeed is if all users are given the same rights in debates, and sysops only use their privileges to block those who break the rules, not those they disagree with. [[User:StatsMsn|StatsMsn]] 22:40, 14 June 2008 (EDT)