Siteadmin, Check users, Administrators
12,071
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 99:
Line 99: + + Line 108:
Line 110: + + + + + + + +
→== Administrative action ==
Let this action be a lesson that need not be repeated.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]<sup>[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]</sup> 22:30, 14 June 2008 (EDT)
Let this action be a lesson that need not be repeated.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]<sup>[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]</sup> 22:30, 14 June 2008 (EDT)
: What do I have to apologize for? [[User:Wandering|Wandering]] 22:37, 14 June 2008 (EDT)
: What do I have to apologize for? [[User:Wandering|Wandering]] 22:37, 14 June 2008 (EDT)
::For meddling in a quarrel that was not yours, and expressing your own contempt of an administrator in the process. And you're doing it all over again. Stop it right now, or get blocked for three days.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]<sup>[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]</sup> 22:55, 14 June 2008 (EDT)
All I did was try and explain who David Hicks is.
All I did was try and explain who David Hicks is.
All I did was try and explain who David Hicks is. I never called you are liar, never asked you to apologise or anything. I am at a loss to what I would be apologising for..?
All I did was try and explain who David Hicks is. I never called you are liar, never asked you to apologise or anything. I am at a loss to what I would be apologising for..?
[[User:AdenJ|AdenJ]] 22:40, 14 June 2008 (EDT)
[[User:AdenJ|AdenJ]] 22:40, 14 June 2008 (EDT)
:::And you don't think you're actively deriding me? And am I not one of those in charge around here?
:::Yes, I now know who David Hicks is. He's an active supporter of terrorism, and appears on his way to getting off on a technicality that the US Supreme Court unwisely handed him. That does not make him innocent; only one who gamed and beat the system.
:::Besides, this issue is a whale of a lot bigger than you seem to want to admit. The potential deaths of a million Americans ought to be big enough. But the systematic fraud perpetrated by the Fourth Estate on the consuming public is a bigger one. We're done accepting twisted news as truth. We have our own standards. And part of that is a critical examination—I say again, a ''critical examination''—of every story that gets published anywhere, and ''exactly'' what that story actually says, not what some people would like to believe that it said.
:::That's enough arguing. You're now down to twenty-three hours. Start thinking, and thinking fast.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]<sup>[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]</sup> 22:55, 14 June 2008 (EDT)