1,516
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 91:
Line 91: + +
Conservapedia talk:Lenski dialog (view source)
Revision as of 15:07, June 15, 2008
, 15:07, June 15, 2008→Request of Examination of raw data is reasonable given the history of evolutionist fraud
: -- [[User:Carafe|Carafe]] 00:44, 15 June 2008 (EDT)
: -- [[User:Carafe|Carafe]] 00:44, 15 June 2008 (EDT)
::I had asked a question above that was never answered, so I'll repeat it here: Who does Conservapedia plan on retaining to review the data from on scientific basis? It would be a lot more professional to select a qualified scientist or panel of scientists to do the job, and let them have a ''professional'' dialog with Prof. Lenski to review the raw data and conclusions. This is just grandstanding - "You haven't delivered gigs and gigs of raw data as requested, so you're withholding data". What it comes down to is that the CP leadership wants anything BUT a professional, qualified review of professor Lenski's work, because the outcome of that is not likely to be what they want. This reminds me of Kent Hovind's "Evolution Challenge" - set up ridiculous demands, and then claim victory because reasonable people don't meet them. --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 11:07, 15 June 2008 (EDT)