5,175
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 96:
Line 96: + + + + + + + + + + + +
Conservapedia talk:Lenski dialog (view source)
Revision as of 16:26, June 15, 2008
, 16:26, June 15, 2008Another email?
:This is it. This one is my favorite post. Carafe has won Conservapedia, roll the credits.--[[user:TomMoore|<font color="#000066" >Tom Moore</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:TomMoore|fiat justitia ruat coelum]]</sup> 01:49, 15 June 2008 (EDT)
:This is it. This one is my favorite post. Carafe has won Conservapedia, roll the credits.--[[user:TomMoore|<font color="#000066" >Tom Moore</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:TomMoore|fiat justitia ruat coelum]]</sup> 01:49, 15 June 2008 (EDT)
== Another email? ==
Is there going to be one? It's entirely possible that, having received a request from a lawyer for data, a scientist might very well think that the data provided in the report would be sufficient. Before deciding that he's hiding something, why not give him enough rope to conclusively hang himself?
"Dear Dr. Lenski,
I'm sorry I didn't make myself clear enough in the first place. We were hoping to see the entirety of the raw data in order to assess it ourselves."
Or some such.
[[User:Aziraphale|Aziraphale]] 12:26, 15 June 2008 (EDT)