Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 115: Line 115:     
I have published in many medical journals and actively peer review for 2 of them. This is how it works in the field of science. Being a lawyer, Mr. Schlafly may not be familiar with the practice. So I do not think the email Aziraphale prepared is appropriate. This is my opinion and most of the users seem to agree with this as well. --[[User:SMaines|SMaines]] 13:35, 15 June 2008 (EDT)
 
I have published in many medical journals and actively peer review for 2 of them. This is how it works in the field of science. Being a lawyer, Mr. Schlafly may not be familiar with the practice. So I do not think the email Aziraphale prepared is appropriate. This is my opinion and most of the users seem to agree with this as well. --[[User:SMaines|SMaines]] 13:35, 15 June 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
In response to Aziraphale, my email was clear and there is no reason for me to say the same thing again.  You're welcome to make your request of Lenski if you really don't think he understood my email.
 +
 +
In response to SMaines, I'll add your name to the list above of people who oppose the public release of data underlying public claims about the data.  (The amount of the data is no obstacle to its release.)  SMaines' approach prevents mistakes and fraud from being identified by independent public review.  Apparently SMaines does not even request availability of the data when he does peer review.  Perhaps he could tell us which journals he does peer review for so that others can have a healthy skepticism about claims made in them.  Of course, SMaines is unlikely to disclose the names of those journals.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 14:21, 15 June 2008 (EDT)
Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,794

edits

Navigation menu