1,516
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 16:
Line 16: + +
Conservapedia talk:Lenski dialog (view source)
Revision as of 18:44, June 15, 2008
, 18:44, June 15, 2008→Request of Examination of raw data is reasonable given the history of evolutionist fraud
::: Public scrutiny has obvious benefits. See "recap" above.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 11:31, 15 June 2008 (EDT)
::: Public scrutiny has obvious benefits. See "recap" above.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 11:31, 15 June 2008 (EDT)
::::I'll repeat my specific point. There's nothing improper about requesting that Professor Lenski share his raw data, but it's disrespectful of his time if there's no intention of using that data purposefully. I had asked what the plan was for having the data reviewed once it's received. Are there any qualified professionals lined up to review it and respond? He showed courtesy and professionalism in responding intra-day to the original request, so it's disrespectful to accuse him of withholding information after a single exchange of emails. --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 14:44, 15 June 2008 (EDT)
== responses of creation scientists to Lenski matter ==
== responses of creation scientists to Lenski matter ==