Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎Recap: reply to TomMoore
Line 6: Line 6:  
:Just for the record, the above as it refers to my own statements is untrue.  I think public scrutiny is excellent.  I believe, in fact, that given that Lenski so promptly answered your questions, he would probably comply with any specific requests you might make.  It does not seem reasonable to demand he send you what must be gigabytes of data off the cuff.  If you were a professional in a field even tangentially related, I imagine he might be happy to do so immediately, but as it is, I suspect you are not at the top of the list for someone as busy as he undoubtedly must be.
 
:Just for the record, the above as it refers to my own statements is untrue.  I think public scrutiny is excellent.  I believe, in fact, that given that Lenski so promptly answered your questions, he would probably comply with any specific requests you might make.  It does not seem reasonable to demand he send you what must be gigabytes of data off the cuff.  If you were a professional in a field even tangentially related, I imagine he might be happy to do so immediately, but as it is, I suspect you are not at the top of the list for someone as busy as he undoubtedly must be.
 
:Perhaps if you sent him an email asking him a specific question: ("I wonder if you would send me the relevant records from the time at which you believe the bacteria became Cit+" might be one, but I am not a biologist) he would answer it with the records or say why he wouldn't.  Or if you wait, they might have time to organize the data into a coherent manner for presentation and make it available on the internet or by request.  Cordiality is key, we agree on that much.--[[user:TomMoore|<font color="#000066" >Tom Moore</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:TomMoore|fiat justitia ruat coelum]]</sup> 15:05, 15 June 2008 (EDT)
 
:Perhaps if you sent him an email asking him a specific question: ("I wonder if you would send me the relevant records from the time at which you believe the bacteria became Cit+" might be one, but I am not a biologist) he would answer it with the records or say why he wouldn't.  Or if you wait, they might have time to organize the data into a coherent manner for presentation and make it available on the internet or by request.  Cordiality is key, we agree on that much.--[[user:TomMoore|<font color="#000066" >Tom Moore</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:TomMoore|fiat justitia ruat coelum]]</sup> 15:05, 15 June 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
:: If you supported public scrutiny of the data, then you would send Lenski an email requesting it.  That you have not, and will not, speaks volumes about your view.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 16:40, 15 June 2008 (EDT)
    
== Request of Examination of raw data is reasonable given the history of evolutionist fraud ==
 
== Request of Examination of raw data is reasonable given the history of evolutionist fraud ==
Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,794

edits

Navigation menu