Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 159: Line 159:  
::::::::::Is that correct?
 
::::::::::Is that correct?
 
::::::::::Given this and other comments you have made, I suspect that you're a satirist attempting to make conservatives look unreasonable.  If so, please stop.  --[[User:Benp|Benp]] 17:06, 15 June 2008 (EDT)
 
::::::::::Given this and other comments you have made, I suspect that you're a satirist attempting to make conservatives look unreasonable.  If so, please stop.  --[[User:Benp|Benp]] 17:06, 15 June 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
::::::::::::I resent being called a satirist. You assume that anyone who doesn't hold your liberal views must be joking! Well, the majority of the people in this country are "satirists" if that is the case. It doesn't much matter if Lenski releases his data or not. Us right thinking people know he's a fraud because he claims to have witnessed evolution, and we know that is impossible. That is a fact! I'd like to see his data. I bet it's so seriously flawed even someone with little background in biology will be able to tell. [[User:TonyT|TonyT]] 21:54, 15 June 2008 (EDT)
    
::::::::::: Where did the 20 years come from?  Lenski was asked for the data supporting his claim.  He has produced some information on a website, but not that data.  Yes, making a claim while withholding the data, even after a request, can reasonably lead one to doubt the claim.  Wouldn't you agree with that?--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 19:23, 15 June 2008 (EDT)
 
::::::::::: Where did the 20 years come from?  Lenski was asked for the data supporting his claim.  He has produced some information on a website, but not that data.  Yes, making a claim while withholding the data, even after a request, can reasonably lead one to doubt the claim.  Wouldn't you agree with that?--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 19:23, 15 June 2008 (EDT)
54

edits

Navigation menu