Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 226: Line 226:     
::Sure, but like the human genome it will probably be released in time anyway in a way that is useful. You standing there making demands, signing letters JD, makes you look like some lawyer with an axe to grind rather than someone interested in research. [[User:DanielB|DanielB]] 20:33, 15 June 2008 (EDT)
 
::Sure, but like the human genome it will probably be released in time anyway in a way that is useful. You standing there making demands, signing letters JD, makes you look like some lawyer with an axe to grind rather than someone interested in research. [[User:DanielB|DanielB]] 20:33, 15 June 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
==Proposed Follow-up Email==
 +
Since Andy wants to send a second email for some of the rest of us to sign as well, here is a space to work out the wording.  I wonder if MainS and Carafe would help us write something that seems reasonable and polite, since you guys seem to have sufficient knowledge in the field to describe what we are looking to find out?
 +
 +
I would suggest something along these lines:
 +
 +
Dear Professor Lenski:
 +
  We are writing in regards to your recent experiment with cit+ development in observed E. coli populations.  We were wondering if you would oblige us by sending the relevant raw data from your observations during the period in which the bacteria population developed the ability to utilize citrase.  We are intensely curious about that information.  If it will be made available through some other venue and you wish to direct us to that instead, then we would very much like to be made aware of that.
 +
  Thank you,
 +
Andy Schlafly, Thomas Moore, etc.
 +
 +
Is that a reasonable request?  I am afraid biology protocol is quite beyond me, so some help would be appreciated.--[[user:TomMoore|<font color="#000066" >Tom Moore</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:TomMoore|fiat justitia ruat coelum]]</sup> 22:47, 15 June 2008 (EDT)
789

edits

Navigation menu