343
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 50:
Line 50: + +
→Significant changes to the article: agreeing with some of the points, concerned about the Splink link
I attempted to merge some of terryeo's edits into the article. [[User:Tmtoulouse|Tmtoulouse]] 02:32, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
I attempted to merge some of terryeo's edits into the article. [[User:Tmtoulouse|Tmtoulouse]] 02:32, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
: We seem to have arrived at a reasonable first and second paragraphs. It has taken some effort :) It is my understanding, however, that Karin Splink's (I write therefore I am) site should not be linked to for the reason that her site presents stolen documents. I don't know all there is to know about the situation, but I have read the documents can not be posted anywhere BUT The Netherland where her site is hosted. In fact, that is the reason her Netherland site carries them. We might be getting ourselves into a legal situation (again, I don't know all there is to know about it) if we link to her site in that manner. [[User:Terryeo|Terryeo]] 03:12, 19 March 2007 (EDT)