Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 62: Line 62:  
:::::::::::"Perhaps"?  I thought my statement above was plain enough, but instead of retracting your false accusation, you're just adding new conditions - now I have to add my signature to an email I haven't seen to show my support for disclosure?  That's a sad way to avoid accountability for making false statements.  Show me the email and a plan for using the data that doesn't make this a waste of time and taxpayer money, and I'll consider signing the request.  In the meantime, please remove the false statements at the top of this page.  --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 22:17, 15 June 2008 (EDT)
 
:::::::::::"Perhaps"?  I thought my statement above was plain enough, but instead of retracting your false accusation, you're just adding new conditions - now I have to add my signature to an email I haven't seen to show my support for disclosure?  That's a sad way to avoid accountability for making false statements.  Show me the email and a plan for using the data that doesn't make this a waste of time and taxpayer money, and I'll consider signing the request.  In the meantime, please remove the false statements at the top of this page.  --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 22:17, 15 June 2008 (EDT)
   −
:::::::::: I'm sure all of us here will gladly join in an email requesting public release of the data in a scientific scrutiny process. -- [[User:Carafe|Carafe]] 20:11, 15 June 2008 (EDT)
+
:::::::::: I'm sure all of us here will gladly join in an email requesting public release of the data in a scientific scrutiny process. I will not however join in your version of "scrutiny", which has nothing to do with scientific scrutiny at all. -- [[User:Carafe|Carafe]] 20:11, 15 June 2008 (EDT)
    
== responses of creation scientists to Lenski matter ==
 
== responses of creation scientists to Lenski matter ==
16

edits

Navigation menu