Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 22: Line 22:     
Your recent paper in PNAS, "Historical contingency and the evolution of a key
 
Your recent paper in PNAS, "Historical contingency and the evolution of a key
−
innovation in an experimental population of Escherichia coli,"[http://myxo.css.msu.edu/lenski/pdf/2008,%20PNAS,%20Blount%20et%20al.pdf] has has interested us greatly.  Knowing PNAS policy of making data available, we were hoping you would accordingly oblige us with your recorded observations for a few key points.
+
innovation in an experimental population of Escherichia coli,"[http://myxo.css.msu.edu/lenski/pdf/2008,%20PNAS,%20Blount%20et%20al.pdf] has interested us greatly.  Knowing PNAS policy of making data available, we were hoping you would accordingly oblige us with your recorded observations for a few key points.
    
We respectfully request the data relating to the period during which the bacterial colony developed cit+; while we see excerpts in the paper, we were hoping to examine them in context.  Your website[https://myxo.css.msu.edu/ecoli/] already discloses some older data, and seems well-suited for public release of the data underlying your recent paper.
 
We respectfully request the data relating to the period during which the bacterial colony developed cit+; while we see excerpts in the paper, we were hoping to examine them in context.  Your website[https://myxo.css.msu.edu/ecoli/] already discloses some older data, and seems well-suited for public release of the data underlying your recent paper.
nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
13,818

edits

Navigation menu