Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,657
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 3:
Line 3: − +
spacing
The court held that the [[First Amendment]] protects against this compelled speech. The State may not "'invad[e] the sphere of intellect and spirit which it is the purpose of the First Amendment of our Constitution to reserve from all official control.'" ''Wooley v. Maynard'', 430 U.S. at 715 (quoting ''West Virginia Bd. of Ed. v. Barnette'', 319 U.S. 624, 642 (1943)).
The court held that the [[First Amendment]] protects against this compelled speech. The State may not "'invad[e] the sphere of intellect and spirit which it is the purpose of the First Amendment of our Constitution to reserve from all official control.'" ''Wooley v. Maynard'', 430 U.S. at 715 (quoting ''West Virginia Bd. of Ed. v. Barnette'', 319 U.S. 624, 642 (1943)).
Then - [[Justice]] [[William Rehnquist]] dissented and was joined by Justice [[Harry Blackmun]].
Then-[[Justice]] [[William Rehnquist]] dissented and was joined by Justice [[Harry Blackmun]].
[[Category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]
[[Category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]
[[Category:First Amendment]]
[[Category:First Amendment]]