5,274
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: − just as fair as all the Liberal [word] articles '''---[[user:DLerner]]---''' 21:02, 15 June 2008 (EDT)+ − :Ummm... but no content, generalizations, etc. --[[User:LyraBelaqua|Lyra Belaqua]] <sup>[[User talk:LyraBelaqua|talk]]</sup> 21:03, 15 June 2008 (EDT)+ − − Note the similar generalizations on the liberal style page. Also, note the conversation on ASchlafly's talk page under "Colleges" where he agreed that the page could exist so long as it did not become a target for "liberal" vandalism (a point that I believe removes one of the entries on this page from the realm of "generalizations"). --[[User:IlTrovatore|IlTrovatore]] 21:05, 15 June 2008 (EDT) − − :If someone decides to write legitimate content, then by all means do, but as it stands right now the best thing to do would be to delete it. --[[User:LyraBelaqua|Lyra Belaqua]] <sup>[[User talk:LyraBelaqua|talk]]</sup> 21:07, 15 June 2008 (EDT) − ::Sounds like an apt description for most the site. '''---[[user:DLerner]]---''' 21:08, 15 June 2008 (EDT) − :::Not funny. The "article" appears to be only a mockery of Aschlafly, and a bad one at that. --[[User:LyraBelaqua|Lyra Belaqua]] <sup>[[User talk:LyraBelaqua|talk]]</sup> 21:10, 15 June 2008 (EDT) − − But if Aschlafly is to be believed, his style counts for that of all conservatives, no? --[[User:IlTrovatore|IlTrovatore]] 21:11, 15 June 2008 (EDT) − :Mockeries have no place in an encyclopedia. --[[User:LyraBelaqua|Lyra Belaqua]] <sup>[[User talk:LyraBelaqua|talk]]</sup> 21:14, 15 June 2008 (EDT) − ::You still think this an encyclopedia?! '''---[[user:DLerner]]---''' 21:16, 15 June 2008 (EDT) − :::Well, not a "real" one, as it were, but it tries to, and I believe with help it will eventually become a family-friendly, good resource unlike [[Wikipedia]]. --[[User:LyraBelaqua|Lyra Belaqua]] <sup>[[User talk:LyraBelaqua|talk]]</sup> 21:19, 15 June 2008 (EDT) − − May I ask where lies the difference between this and the liberal style article? Out of 56 points on that page, only about 8 have any form of source or citation. I thought conservapedia was supposed to be fair and balanced? --[[User:AndrasK|AndrasK]] 21:18, 15 June 2008 (EDT) − :No that's [[Fox News]], my Danish friend. --[[User:LyraBelaqua|Lyra Belaqua]] <sup>[[User talk:LyraBelaqua|talk]]</sup> 21:19, 15 June 2008 (EDT) − − I believe Andras is a Hungarian name. Ten bucks says you guessed incorrectly. --[[User:IlTrovatore|IlTrovatore]] 21:21, 15 June 2008 (EDT) − :Kjeldsen is Danish. [[User:LyraBelaqua|Lyra Belaqua]] <sup>[[User talk:LyraBelaqua|talk]]</sup> 21:23, 15 June 2008 (EDT) − − Yeah, and Kjeldsen is not Andras. --[[User:IlTrovatore|IlTrovatore]] 21:24, 15 June 2008 (EDT)
Conservapedia:AFD Conservative Style (view source)
Revision as of 23:49, June 17, 2008
, 23:49, June 17, 2008starting actual discussion
[[Conservative Style]] is unencyclopedic, has very little content of any value in it, and is just a magnet for edit wars and vandalism. [[User:HenryS|HenryS]] 19:49, 17 June 2008 (EDT)
*'''Delete''' [[User:HenryS|HenryS]] 19:49, 17 June 2008 (EDT)