Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,794
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 419:
Line 419: − + − :: That's because I see your position on 'public access' is pure bluster. I'm confident that should someone make a reasonable request Lenski will provide a reasonable response i.e. access to his 'raw data' (what do you think that might be by the way?) My issue is that you are simply seeking to waste Lenski's time to save face. I'm also confident that most adults who bother to read the exchange on this page see right through you. [[User:AndyMann|AndyMann]] 09:05, 18 June 2008 (EDT)
Conservapedia talk:Lenski dialog (view source)
Revision as of 13:07, June 18, 2008
, 13:07, June 18, 2008Reverted edits by AndyMann (Talk); changed back to last version by Aschlafly
# you "skimmed" it
# you "skimmed" it
# you won't do anything with the "raw data" should he send it to you
# you won't do anythnig with the "raw data" should he send it to you
Thank you for your honesty. I hope your readership takes these answers in their full measure. [[User:AndyMann|AndyMann]] 19:30, 17 June 2008 (EDT)
Thank you for your honesty. I hope your readership takes these answers in their full measure. [[User:AndyMann|AndyMann]] 19:30, 17 June 2008 (EDT)
: I hope you recognize and admit to the benefits of public access. You haven't yet.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 23:34, 17 June 2008 (EDT)
: I hope you recognize and admit to the benefits of public access. You haven't yet.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 23:34, 17 June 2008 (EDT)
=== Two Questions for Aschlafly: comments from others===
=== Two Questions for Aschlafly: comments from others===