23
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 23:
Line 23: + + +
Conservapedia:Is Wikipedia really as bad as it is made out to be (view source)
Revision as of 16:27, June 18, 2008
, 16:27, June 18, 2008→NO
Thank you for reading. What do you think?
Thank you for reading. What do you think?
[[User:Argonaut|Argonaut]] 20:15, 1 July 2007 (EDT)
[[User:Argonaut|Argonaut]] 20:15, 1 July 2007 (EDT)
I just have to reply here, for I don't agree with the question itself. Conservapedia and Wikipedia are just two different wikis, each with its own perspective, policies and target audience(if that's the right word). They are just for different people with different opinions, so I don't see why people are getting so worked up about it. NPOV!!!NPOV!!! [[Usertalk:Faizaguo|NPOV!!!]]--[[User:Faizaguo|Faizaguo]] 12:27, 18 June 2008 (EDT)
==YES==
==YES==
The [[liberal]] bias produces an effect far more deleterious than one can account for merely by saying, "Oh, but people all over the world, not just the [[United States]], contribute to it." The dispute between liberals and [[conservative]]s is often a ''dispute of fact.'' When people cannot agree on the facts, debate is impossible. And if, for example, the [[United Nations]] were to pass a resolution saying that two plus two shall be equal to five, or that the value of "pi" shall be an even 3--well, I fail to see why the citizens of the United States--or for that matter the subjects of the [[United Kingdom]] or the [[Commonwealth of Nations]]--need accede to or comply with such resolutions.
The [[liberal]] bias produces an effect far more deleterious than one can account for merely by saying, "Oh, but people all over the world, not just the [[United States]], contribute to it." The dispute between liberals and [[conservative]]s is often a ''dispute of fact.'' When people cannot agree on the facts, debate is impossible. And if, for example, the [[United Nations]] were to pass a resolution saying that two plus two shall be equal to five, or that the value of "pi" shall be an even 3--well, I fail to see why the citizens of the United States--or for that matter the subjects of the [[United Kingdom]] or the [[Commonwealth of Nations]]--need accede to or comply with such resolutions.