5,274
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 4:
Line 4: +
no edit summary
:There's not much going on right now. Recent changes is flooded with deletions. Thanks for creating the article, its always nice to get new content. Btw, are you going to start up a discussion for [[Liberal Style]]? Since we both know deletion is unlikely, perhaps request moving it out of the encyclopedia namespace? [[User:HenryS|HenryS]] 17:44, 18 June 2008 (EDT)
:There's not much going on right now. Recent changes is flooded with deletions. Thanks for creating the article, its always nice to get new content. Btw, are you going to start up a discussion for [[Liberal Style]]? Since we both know deletion is unlikely, perhaps request moving it out of the encyclopedia namespace? [[User:HenryS|HenryS]] 17:44, 18 June 2008 (EDT)
::I try not to pick fights over any of the honeypot articles. I mean, if I were to go after Liberal Style I'd have to go after the literally thirty similar pages, and probably the forty-odd pages with nothing but quotes about homosexuality. I'd rather edit on issues of clear fact, rather than on things deemed "obvious" and get myself condemned as "clueless."--[[user:TomMoore|<font color="#000066" >Tom Moore</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:TomMoore|fiat justitia ruat coelum]]</sup> 17:55, 18 June 2008 (EDT)
::I try not to pick fights over any of the honeypot articles. I mean, if I were to go after Liberal Style I'd have to go after the literally thirty similar pages, and probably the forty-odd pages with nothing but quotes about homosexuality. I'd rather edit on issues of clear fact, rather than on things deemed "obvious" and get myself condemned as "clueless."--[[user:TomMoore|<font color="#000066" >Tom Moore</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:TomMoore|fiat justitia ruat coelum]]</sup> 17:55, 18 June 2008 (EDT)
:::I know that these thirty Liberal _____ articles will always exist on this site. But that is no reason to create even more of them (Conservative ______). The problem is that they are inherently unencyclopedic, though I am sure you know that already. A massive cross-namespace move isn't too difficult, why not pursue that? Perhaps to the "conservapedia" namespace? Or how about requesting adding all of them into a single "list of liberal characteristics" article, so that way there aren't so many of them? [[User:HenryS|HenryS]] 18:04, 18 June 2008 (EDT)