1,161
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 33:
Line 33: + + + +
→Observations of Conservapedia
I have been editing the [[Atheism]] and [[Theory of evolution]] articles recently, and just realizing that it's not that they have bad content, but it's not organized in such a way as to easily sort through it. What Conservapedia needs is people who know how to look at the big picture of an article and categorize and put in subheadings the topics that are already addressed in its text.
I have been editing the [[Atheism]] and [[Theory of evolution]] articles recently, and just realizing that it's not that they have bad content, but it's not organized in such a way as to easily sort through it. What Conservapedia needs is people who know how to look at the big picture of an article and categorize and put in subheadings the topics that are already addressed in its text.
'''We Need Groups of People to Handle Categories of Content'''
One thing I like about Wikipedia is that it has "WikiProjects" or groups that manage and oversee large sections of content. For example, a group of people might manage all there is to know about [[science]] (and there would be sub groups under this). Another group might manage all there is to know under [[geography]], [[technology]], etc. Now, I realize that we do not have as many people constantly editing Conservapedia as Wikipedia does theirs, but I think it would be wise to start something like this. Maybe our first project should simply be organizing a group to organize groups :-).
=== Main Focus ===
=== Main Focus ===