Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
general reply
Line 698: Line 698:     
[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 22:36, 19 June 2008 (EDT)
 
[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 22:36, 19 June 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
== General Reply ==
 +
 +
Lenski has essentially refused my request that he make his underlying data available for public scrutiny, despite his use of public funding.  Given the remarkably short time between submission of his PNAS manuscript and its acceptance (only 14 days), I doubt his paper even had meaningful peer review.
 +
 +
It's unscientific for others to repeat as true an unverified claim based on concealed data.  I wonder if PNAS violated its own stated policies by publishing Lenski's paper, and I'm going to email its Editor-in-Chief to request an explanation.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 11:19, 20 June 2008 (EDT)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,936

edits

Navigation menu