Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 752: Line 752:     
:: I intended peer review in general, not just at the PNAS, but that's a fair comparison.  Like Murray, I would have thought that a fortnight is sufficient, but you do appear to be correct that the Lenski paper was much quicker than normal at the PNAS.  So that just leaves the question of broken policies... [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 12:24, 20 June 2008 (EDT)
 
:: I intended peer review in general, not just at the PNAS, but that's a fair comparison.  Like Murray, I would have thought that a fortnight is sufficient, but you do appear to be correct that the Lenski paper was much quicker than normal at the PNAS.  So that just leaves the question of broken policies... [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 12:24, 20 June 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
:::If you take Lenski's paper for what it is, peer review of the paper would not take long after all.  The majority of his data could be kick out for his paper is just the documentation of the bacteria using the citrate.  Murry, what is this about breast cancer?--[[User:Able806|Able806]] 12:30, 20 June 2008 (EDT)
nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW
461

edits

Navigation menu