412
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 5:
Line 5: + + +
Conservapedia:AFD Major bias in conservapedia (view source)
Revision as of 14:35, March 19, 2007
, 14:35, March 19, 2007no edit summary
:Agreed. This will generate more heat than light. If there are no coherent objections by the time I'm logging off for the day, I'll go ahead and delete it. [[User:Tsumetai|Tsumetai]] 10:11, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
:Agreed. This will generate more heat than light. If there are no coherent objections by the time I'm logging off for the day, I'll go ahead and delete it. [[User:Tsumetai|Tsumetai]] 10:11, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
:'''Conditional Delete''' As above, it ''is'' a troll magnet. But we do need a page devoted to hashing out disputes that are not page specific; otherwise it either ends up on the [[Conservapedia:Abuse| Abuse]] page or on [[User_Talk: Aschlafly| Aschlafly]]'s talk page. I suggest a less pejorative name, "Conservapdia: Discussion" with a line denoting that it is for discussions that are not strictly abuse but merely differences in POV's.
:Putting it under Discussion would ensure that things that are in '''contention''' are being talked about, having it as a listing in the main talk page would only invite "how's the weather?" posts. There are problems here and they need to be aired out otherwise we're all going to lose a great project. MOO --[[User:Cracker|Cracker]]<sup>[[User_Talk:Cracker|talk]]</sup> 10:35, 19 March 2007 (EDT)