Changes

:Correct.  On the other hand, if I am the owner of the pharmacy, I am not required to ''employ'' a person who cannot or will not do the job I need done.  That's the issue here.  While the pharmacist is free to choose to follow or not follow their conscience, Big Government has no right to compel employers to hire or retain that pharmacist. If someone joins the Army voluntarily with the understanding that the job will involve fighting, and then refuses to fight when the time comes on the grounds that it violates their conscience, you'd better believe there are consequences for that...consequences a lot more serious than simply losing a job.  --[[User:Benp|Benp]] 13:13, 21 June 2008 (EDT)

:Correct.  On the other hand, if I am the owner of the pharmacy, I should not be required to ''employ'' a person who cannot or will not do the job I need done.  That's the issue here.  While the pharmacist is free to choose to follow or not follow their conscience, Big Government has no right to compel employers to hire or retain that pharmacist. If someone joins the Army voluntarily with the understanding that the job will involve fighting, and then refuses to fight when the time comes on the grounds that it violates their conscience, you'd better believe there are consequences for that...consequences a lot more serious than simply losing a job.  --[[User:Benp|Benp]] 13:13, 21 June 2008 (EDT)