1,019
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 34:
Line 34: + + + + + + + + + +
no edit summary
:Actually the diversity is mostly to do with the ''targets'' of Pax6, rather than changes in the gene itself, but that's not really important. In fact I would say that the article is confusion macro''mutation'' with macroevolution. Persumably creationists believe the theory of evolution predicts that annelids turned into vertebrates, which is really what that sentence would disprove. It just goes to show that the entire thing was written by someone with absolutely no basing in biology. [[User:Nematocyte|Nematocyte]] 10:52, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
:Actually the diversity is mostly to do with the ''targets'' of Pax6, rather than changes in the gene itself, but that's not really important. In fact I would say that the article is confusion macro''mutation'' with macroevolution. Persumably creationists believe the theory of evolution predicts that annelids turned into vertebrates, which is really what that sentence would disprove. It just goes to show that the entire thing was written by someone with absolutely no basing in biology. [[User:Nematocyte|Nematocyte]] 10:52, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
==Changes==
Since this article is bound to be rather contentious, I'm going to explain my changes here, and invite other editors to do likewise:
#"unproven theory" is redundant
#"transform an organism into a completely different kind of organism" is simply wrong; is man ''completely'' different from other apes? No, of course not; we're all apes, all primates, all mammals, all animals, etc. etc.
[[User:Tsumetai|Tsumetai]] 11:06, 19 March 2007 (EDT)