12
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 53:
Line 53: + +
Debate:Can conservapedia become the next Wikipedia, is this good or bad (view source)
Revision as of 11:01, June 23, 2008
, 11:01, June 23, 2008no edit summary
Can CP become as big as Wiki? Certainly. But we need to point out the outrageous bias that wikipedia stands for and embraces. This bias can be found in almost all articles dealing with issues of contention. NPOV in their eyes is the extreme liberal view, the one that militants will tell you is the only truth. The sad thing is that if we were better organized and had more committed members, Wiki wouldn't be able to get away with the garbage and biases that are so rampant. --[[User:Irpw|Irpw]]
Can CP become as big as Wiki? Certainly. But we need to point out the outrageous bias that wikipedia stands for and embraces. This bias can be found in almost all articles dealing with issues of contention. NPOV in their eyes is the extreme liberal view, the one that militants will tell you is the only truth. The sad thing is that if we were better organized and had more committed members, Wiki wouldn't be able to get away with the garbage and biases that are so rampant. --[[User:Irpw|Irpw]]
In contrast to Wikipedia, Conservapedia is blatantly biased towards a fanatical religious right. I have also found it's database to be tremendously smaller than wikipedia's and it's content is incorrect more often than wikipedia's. So no, I do not think that Wikipedia should be overthrown in it's endeavor for free and accurate information.