23
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 4:
Line 4: + + + +
no edit summary
::Hmm.. right, I should have checked up before accusing you of wrong. At least I wasn't dumb this time and blocked someone for doing some good... [[User:NathanG|Nate]] 22:15, 22 June 2008 (EDT)
::Hmm.. right, I should have checked up before accusing you of wrong. At least I wasn't dumb this time and blocked someone for doing some good... [[User:NathanG|Nate]] 22:15, 22 June 2008 (EDT)
:::No worries. If you had briefly blocked me, I totally would've forgiven you. Mistakes happen, after all, and you would have done it to protect the project against a potential troublemaker. :) It also only occurred to me later on that not everybody might know that "salted" is [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Protected_deleted_pages#Creation_protection wiki-slang] for "protected against (re-)creation", so I'm not ''entirely'' innocent, I guess. --[[User:KevinM|KevinM]] 22:22, 22 June 2008 (EDT)
:::No worries. If you had briefly blocked me, I totally would've forgiven you. Mistakes happen, after all, and you would have done it to protect the project against a potential troublemaker. :) It also only occurred to me later on that not everybody might know that "salted" is [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Protected_deleted_pages#Creation_protection wiki-slang] for "protected against (re-)creation", so I'm not ''entirely'' innocent, I guess. --[[User:KevinM|KevinM]] 22:22, 22 June 2008 (EDT)
==4chan==
The article [[4chan]] was protected with a '''.''' as the reason. Technical error perhaps? [[User:RobertBobkins|RobertBobkins]] 15:01, 23 June 2008 (EDT)