Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 59: Line 59:  
::But if it has a god, or multiple gods, it's by definition not atheistic. [[User:EBrown|EBrown]] 19:31, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
 
::But if it has a god, or multiple gods, it's by definition not atheistic. [[User:EBrown|EBrown]] 19:31, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
 
:::It could still be a "god" in a metaphorical sense like the one I presented above. Maybe someone who has read her book can clarify this? [[User:WilliamH|WilliamH]] 19:34, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
 
:::It could still be a "god" in a metaphorical sense like the one I presented above. Maybe someone who has read her book can clarify this? [[User:WilliamH|WilliamH]] 19:34, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
 +
::::Yes, that would be most helpful-- As would a note in the article to the same extent. [[User:EBrown|EBrown]] 19:35, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
56

edits

Navigation menu