Changes

==Catholic Encyclopedia==

==Catholic Encyclopedia==

*''Discussion moved from'' [[User_talk:Aschlafly#Adultery]]

*''Discussion moved from'' [[User_talk:Aschlafly#Adultery]]

This article has been vandalised by RSchalfy, and having reverted the article to contain his own ridiculous view of adultery to be only committed by women, locked the article.  If this isn't proof that this ludicrous "Trustworhy Encyclopedia" is a farce, I don't know what is.  I doubt you'll ban your own brother, but this deserves it.  50something. {{Unsigned|50something}}  

This article has been vanda<--graagh-->lised by RSchalfy, and having reverted the article to contain his own ridiculous view of adultery to be only committed by women, locked the article.  If this isn't proof that this ludicrous "Trustworhy Encyclopedia" is a farce, I don't know what is.  I doubt you'll ban your own brother, but this deserves it.  50something. {{Unsigned|50something}}  

:So the ''Washington Post'' trumps the Book of Leviticus, [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Adultery&diff=122101&oldid=122095] is that the argument?  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 16:17, 22 April 2007 (EDT)

:So the ''Washington Post'' trumps the Book of Leviticus, [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Adultery&diff=122101&oldid=122095] is that the argument?  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 16:17, 22 April 2007 (EDT)

: I think that your problem is that you are only reading the first sentence of each of the references. If you read on, you will find that the references back up what the article says. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 13:38, 10 May 2007 (EDT)

: I think that your problem is that you are only reading the first sentence of each of the references. If you read on, you will find that the references back up what the article says. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 13:38, 10 May 2007 (EDT)