Changes

::::::It does seem rather odd that one of his references was omitted. It can hardly be a pornographic site.  In general, what other links are subject to censorship?--[[User:British_cons|British_cons]] [[User_talk:British_cons|(talk)]] 09:30, 24 June 2008 (EDT)

::::::It does seem rather odd that one of his references was omitted. It can hardly be a pornographic site.  In general, what other links are subject to censorship?--[[User:British_cons|British_cons]] [[User_talk:British_cons|(talk)]] 09:30, 24 June 2008 (EDT)

Mr Schlafly has said that the site concerned has been deemed unacceptable. Further questioning on this point will be deemed disruptive and dealt with accordingly. Thank you. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 09:35, 24 June 2008 (EDT)

Mr Schlafly has said that the site concerned has been deemed unacceptable. Further questioning on this point will be deemed disruptive and dealt with accordingly. Thank you. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 09:35, 24 June 2008 (EDT)

:It hardly seems fair to censor part of Professor Lenski's full and comprehensive reply.  It also seems to be a little heavy-handed to say that people who ask questions about such censorship will be "dealt with accordingly".

:It hardly seems fair to censor part of Professor Lenski's full and comprehensive reply.  It also seems to be a little heavy-handed to say that people who ask questions about such censorship will be "dealt with accordingly".--[[User:British_cons|British_cons]] [[User_talk:British_cons|(talk)]] 09:40, 24 June 2008 (EDT)

==Peer Review Process==

==Peer Review Process==