Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
6 bytes added ,  16:10, June 24, 2008
m
bold
Line 1: Line 1: −
In ''Ashcroft v. ACLU'', 542 U.S. 656 (2004), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] invalidated the [[Child Online Protection Act]], which would have required pornographers to take reasonable steps to restrict access by minors to porn on the internet.  
+
In '''''Ashcroft v. ACLU''''', 542 U.S. 656 (2004), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] invalidated the [[Child Online Protection Act]], which would have required pornographers to take reasonable steps to restrict access by minors to porn on the internet.  
    
This law, which the Supreme Court struck down, did not censor a single word or picture.  It merely required the pornographers to screen their websites from minors, which can be done by credit card or other verification.  
 
This law, which the Supreme Court struck down, did not censor a single word or picture.  It merely required the pornographers to screen their websites from minors, which can be done by credit card or other verification.  
5,190

edits

Navigation menu