Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, Moderators, move, protect, rollback, Administrators
27,336
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 1:
Line 1: − − == WARNING! Before reading this article, please understand that conservopedia is extremely highly biassed, even thought it is from the consvative viewpoint. Most of you conservatists probably are proud of american rights, howcome you are denying those "rights" from those who don't share your political views? Sorry to aweke you to the truth (it truly shall set you free), but you are all HYPOCRITICAL, and I thought (as a fellow christian) that christianity was about caring and loving== − − == Hypocrisy I mentioned? Look at thase articles, for example. == − [[Homosexuality]] − − [[Barack Obama]] − − [[Atheism]] − − [[Liberal]] − − − == Do you feel bad? You really should. == − − − == Please, Don't misunderstand me, but this is for your own good. I don't want to force any political opinnions on you, nor do I want to offend anyone. How can one preach of compassion and love, if ones actions are nothing but slaughter and murder? Bad example, but you do get the point. As of your kids rights (rights to choose ones own life partner, ones right to choose religion, right to live a happy life and many others), DON'T brainwash your opinnions and values on them. Instead, tell them WHY you hold them, WHY you chose them (or were you brainwashed too?) and WHY they are dear to you. One can have true understanding if one doesn't see the both sides of an argument in equal light, don't deny your child that right to make their own choices, they too are intellectual human beings. Should they decide upon their own judgment to honor the same things as you do, you truly have child who HONORS them, because he got to choose them he honors them, for how can one honor values one doesn't understand? BUT, first of all, DON'T JUDGE if they decide something else, they are still your children, and due to freedom of speech, they have the right to hold their own opinnion (Aren't you Americans prud of freedom of speech?) == − − − == This will get deleted soon, I understand that. This is, by definition, vandalism. But I wan't you to hear (should I say, my?) truth. I wan't to make a difference in someones life, I want you to really think, do you hold the values you preach. This is for the good of everyone == − − − == Don't think bad of me, please, I only mean good. == − − − ==Sincerely yours, − The one who shows your own faults, so you can correct them == − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − − −
Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 16:57, June 24, 2008
, 16:57, June 24, 2008Reverted edits by Conservatist888 (Talk); changed back to last version by Bugler
The following is a growing list of examples of '''[[liberal bias]], [[deceit]], silly [[gossip]], and blatant errors on [[Wikipedia]]'''.
The following is a growing list of examples of '''[[liberal bias]], [[deceit]], silly [[gossip]], and blatant errors on [[Wikipedia]]'''.
#[[Wikipedia]] will give often great prominence to [[liberal]] criticism of someone, while almost never giving such prominence to [[conservative]] criticism of a [[liberal]]. For example, Wikipedia's entry for [[conservative]] [[Texas]] legislator Debbie Riddle is devoted mostly to [[liberal]] criticism of an obscure quote of her.<ref>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debbie_Riddle</ref> But Wikipedia's entry for [[liberal]] [[Chuck Schumer]] consists of glowing praise without including any [[conservative]] criticism of him.<ref>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Schumer</ref>
#[[Wikipedia]] will give often great prominence to [[liberal]] criticism of someone, while almost never giving such prominence to [[conservative]] criticism of a [[liberal]]. For example, Wikipedia's entry for [[conservative]] [[Texas]] legislator Debbie Riddle is devoted mostly to [[liberal]] criticism of an obscure quote of her.<ref>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debbie_Riddle</ref> But Wikipedia's entry for [[liberal]] [[Chuck Schumer]] consists of glowing praise without including any [[conservative]] criticism of him.<ref>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Schumer</ref>