Changes

::::: I am concerned that you have chosen to censor an element of Lenski's reply. Could you please be more specific. If Lenski's reply contained vulgarities etc this is of note to the argument at hand. [[User:RedDog|RedDog]] 08:15, 24 June 2008 (EDT)

::::: I am concerned that you have chosen to censor an element of Lenski's reply. Could you please be more specific. If Lenski's reply contained vulgarities etc this is of note to the argument at hand. [[User:RedDog|RedDog]] 08:15, 24 June 2008 (EDT)

::::::It does seem rather odd that one of his references was omitted. It can hardly be a pornographic site.  In general, what other links are subject to censorship?--[[User:British_cons|British_cons]] [[User_talk:British_cons|(talk)]] 09:30, 24 June 2008 (EDT)

::::::It does seem rather odd that one of his references was omitted. It can hardly be a pornographic site.  In general, what other links are subject to censorship?--[[User:British_cons|British_cons]] [[User_talk:British_cons|(talk)]] 09:30, 24 June 2008 (EDT)

Mr Schlafly has said that the site concerned has been deemed unacceptable. Further questioning on this point will be deemed disruptive and dealt with accordingly. Thank you. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 09:35, 24 June 2008 (EDT)

<nowiki>http://www.tinyurl.com/5qjao8</nowiki> [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 09:35, 24 June 2008 (EDT)

:It hardly seems fair to censor part of Professor Lenski's full and comprehensive reply.  It also seems to be a little heavy-handed to say that people who ask questions about such censorship will be "dealt with accordingly".--[[User:British_cons|British_cons]] [[User_talk:British_cons|(talk)]] 09:40, 24 June 2008 (EDT)

:It hardly seems fair to censor part of Professor Lenski's full and comprehensive reply.  It also seems to be a little heavy-handed to say that people who ask questions about such censorship will be "dealt with accordingly".--[[User:British_cons|British_cons]] [[User_talk:British_cons|(talk)]] 09:40, 24 June 2008 (EDT)

:::If I am allowed to continue questioning this without further threats from sysop:Bugler I would say that it seems to me to be extremely unlikely that the link would be to "shock site". But I agree with you that we should be told why it was necessary to censor the reply.  Especially so when Mr Schafly has been arguing for the importance of the disclosure of data all this time.--[[User:British_cons|British_cons]] [[User_talk:British_cons|(talk)]] 10:08, 24 June 2008 (EDT)

:::If I am allowed to continue questioning this without further threats from sysop:Bugler I would say that it seems to me to be extremely unlikely that the link would be to "shock site". But I agree with you that we should be told why it was necessary to censor the reply.  Especially so when Mr Schafly has been arguing for the importance of the disclosure of data all this time.--[[User:British_cons|British_cons]] [[User_talk:British_cons|(talk)]] 10:08, 24 June 2008 (EDT)

::::Deal however you see fit Bugler old fruit. Your censorship of both me and more importantly of Lenski will stand fine testament. [[User:RedDog|RedDog]] 10:20, 24 June 2008 (EDT)

::::Deal however you see fit Bugler old fruit. Your censorship of both me and more importantly of Lenski will stand fine testament. [[User:RedDog|RedDog]] 10:20, 24 June 2008 (EDT)

Censorship? Censorship? Even a good dog needs a tug on the choke chain every now and again - and where on earth am I supposed to have censored the esteemed Prof? [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 10:23, 24 June 2008 (EDT)

<nowiki>http://www.tinyurl.com/5qjao8</nowiki> [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 10:23, 24 June 2008 (EDT)

:Bugler. Very obviously the link in Lenski's e-mail has been censored (as per the top of this thread). I have simply asked specifically why this is the case. If that gets me banned it says more about you than me. [[User:RedDog|RedDog]] 10:31, 24 June 2008 (EDT)

:Bugler. Very obviously the link in Lenski's e-mail has been censored (as per the top of this thread). I have simply asked specifically why this is the case. If that gets me banned it says more about you than me. [[User:RedDog|RedDog]] 10:31, 24 June 2008 (EDT)

::Bugler, perhaps rather than trying to speak for Mr. Schlafly, you could stand down and let him respond to questions that were directed at him and that he is more qualified to answer.  [[User:ZTak|ZTak]] 10:35, 24 June 2008 (EDT)

::Bugler, perhaps rather than trying to speak for Mr. Schlafly, you could stand down and let him respond to questions that were directed at him and that he is more qualified to answer.  [[User:ZTak|ZTak]] 10:35, 24 June 2008 (EDT)

:::RedDog, it has been removed as it links to a site deemed unacceptable. I do not know what the link was. I did no remove it. However, one either believes that Andrew Schlafly acted in good faith or not. If you believe not, then why should you be here? I know I wouldn't be. And since he acted in good faith and the best interests of CP, we should leave it at that.

:::<nowiki>http://www.tinyurl.com/5qjao8</nowiki> [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 10:39, 24 June 2008 (EDT)

 

 

[[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 10:39, 24 June 2008 (EDT)

:I agree Bugler and I accept good faith. But make no mistake this IS censorship. There is no other word for it. I do accept what you say though and will let the matter drop here. [[User:RedDog|RedDog]] 10:41, 24 June 2008 (EDT)

:I agree Bugler and I accept good faith. But make no mistake this IS censorship. There is no other word for it. I do accept what you say though and will let the matter drop here. [[User:RedDog|RedDog]] 10:41, 24 June 2008 (EDT)

:What is "RW"? [[User:Drochld|Drochld]] 10:50, 24 June 2008 (EDT)

:What is "RW"? [[User:Drochld|Drochld]] 10:50, 24 June 2008 (EDT)

- :If you knew that is the site, it would be improper for you to mention it by name. Since you don't know, it is utterly irresponsible of you to speculate. Do you see what you have started? [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 10:52, 24 June 2008 (EDT)

- :<nowiki>http://www.tinyurl.com/5qjao8</nowiki> [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 10:52, 24 June 2008 (EDT)

::Asking what it is seems a lot different from speculating as to what it is... [[User:EBrown|EBrown]] 10:54, 24 June 2008 (EDT)

::Asking what it is seems a lot different from speculating as to what it is... [[User:EBrown|EBrown]] 10:54, 24 June 2008 (EDT)

:::Sorry, that comment was to CPadmin, not Drochld [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 11:10, 24 June 2008 (EDT)

:::<nowiki>http://www.tinyurl.com/5qjao8</nowiki> [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 11:10, 24 June 2008 (EDT)

::::No problem; apology accepted. [[User:Drochld|Drochld]] 11:15, 24 June 2008 (EDT)

::::No problem; apology accepted. [[User:Drochld|Drochld]] 11:15, 24 June 2008 (EDT)

(@Tim)Why would Professor Lenski be linking to RW? Quite frankly, there are many other more reliable websites to be used as sources... --_{[[Special:Contributions/AutoFire|<font color= 'black' face= 'OCR A Extended'>trans</font>]]}[[User:AutoFire|<font color= 'red' face= 'OCR A Extended'>Resident Transfan</font>]]^{[[User Talk:AutoFire|<font color= 'black' face= 'OCR A Extended'>form!</font>]]} 10:57, 24 June 2008 (EDT)

(@Tim)Why would Professor Lenski be linking to RW? Quite frankly, there are many other more reliable websites to be used as sources... --_{[[Special:Contributions/AutoFire|<font color= 'black' face= 'OCR A Extended'>trans</font>]]}[[User:AutoFire|<font color= 'red' face= 'OCR A Extended'>Resident Transfan</font>]]^{[[User Talk:AutoFire|<font color= 'black' face= 'OCR A Extended'>form!</font>]]} 10:57, 24 June 2008 (EDT)

:::RW is a wiki which claims to be rational.  It is highly critical of Conservapedia and I had understood that mentioning its existence generally got the poster blocked.  Am I correct in this or has that polocy changed?[[User:Tolerance|Tolerance]] 11:09, 24 June 2008 (EDT)

:::RW is a wiki which claims to be rational.  It is highly critical of Conservapedia and I had understood that mentioning its existence generally got the poster blocked.  Am I correct in this or has that polocy changed?[[User:Tolerance|Tolerance]] 11:09, 24 June 2008 (EDT)

::::Tolerance is correct. The place is the cesspit of the internet. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 11:12, 24 June 2008 (EDT)

::::<nowiki>http://www.tinyurl.com/5qjao8</nowiki> [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 11:12, 24 June 2008 (EDT)

:::::I assume you don't visit the cesspit? --[[User:Jareddr|Jareddr]] 11:20, 24 June 2008 (EDT)

:::::I assume you don't visit the cesspit? --[[User:Jareddr|Jareddr]] 11:20, 24 June 2008 (EDT)