Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1,023: Line 1,023:  
People on this board have made "broad generalizations" against Lenski and assumed that he is:  1.  An atheist, 2.  A liberal.   
 
People on this board have made "broad generalizations" against Lenski and assumed that he is:  1.  An atheist, 2.  A liberal.   
   −
Who says that he doesn't have socially conservative values?  Also, he states in his most recent letter that he's also a church-goer.  He never said that he's a raging Richard Dawkins, PZ Meyers atheist, or an atheist at all.  So someone please clarify for me, is it possible to be conservative and also be a scientist who has discovered "alleged" evidence of evolution?  Is it also OK for that person to not be an atheist or a liberal?
+
Who says that he doesn't have socially conservative values?  Also, he states in his most recent letter that he's also a church-goer.  He never said that he's a raging Richard Dawkins, PZ Meyers atheist, or an atheist at all.  So someone please clarify for me, is it possible to be conservative and also be a scientist who has discovered "alleged" evidence of evolution?  Is it also OK for that person to not be an atheist or a liberal? --eligus
10

edits

Navigation menu