679
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 340:
Line 340: + +
no edit summary
PF Fox: I have unlocked the page for editing. For the time being, I propose leaving out all the specualtion regarding "was it 57 or 87?", etc. I hope you will review this information regarding the Lee List [http://www.johnearlhaynes.org/page62.html], and between the two sources we can craft langauge. Thank you. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 12:40, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
PF Fox: I have unlocked the page for editing. For the time being, I propose leaving out all the specualtion regarding "was it 57 or 87?", etc. I hope you will review this information regarding the Lee List [http://www.johnearlhaynes.org/page62.html], and between the two sources we can craft langauge. Thank you. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 12:40, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
But what I included was not "speculation." It is a FACT that McCarthy gave three very different numbers on three different occasions. I don't speculate on WHY he did this, but I simply point it out. Why should that fact not be included? And I've already seen that piece on the Lee list. How would it change anything I posted? --[[User:PF Fox|PF Fox]] 12:59, 19 March 2007 (EDT)