3
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1,039:
Line 1,039: + +
Conservapedia talk:Lenski dialog (view source)
Revision as of 13:19, June 26, 2008
, 13:19, June 26, 2008→Evidence of Conservative Christian Evolutionist
{{QuoteBox|And the creationists have also shown irrefutably that those liberal and neo–orthodox Christians who regard the creation stories as myths or allegories are undermining the rest of Scripture, for if there was no Adam, there was no fall; and if there was no fall there was no hell; and if there was no hell, there was no need of Jesus as Second Adam and Incarnate Savior, crucified and risen. As a result, the whole biblical system of salvation collapses.[http://creationontheweb.com/content/view/3459]}}
{{QuoteBox|And the creationists have also shown irrefutably that those liberal and neo–orthodox Christians who regard the creation stories as myths or allegories are undermining the rest of Scripture, for if there was no Adam, there was no fall; and if there was no fall there was no hell; and if there was no hell, there was no need of Jesus as Second Adam and Incarnate Savior, crucified and risen. As a result, the whole biblical system of salvation collapses.[http://creationontheweb.com/content/view/3459]}}
: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 09:11, 26 June 2008 (EDT)
: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 09:11, 26 June 2008 (EDT)
::Thanks, Philip. Now I think I understand.--[[User:Aristotle56|Aristotle56]] 09:19, 26 June 2008 (EDT)
== Why... ==
== Why... ==