39
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 920:
Line 920: + +
Conservapedia talk:Lenski dialog (view source)
Revision as of 20:31, June 26, 2008
, 20:31, June 26, 2008→E. coli in our bowels: Refuting Jinxmchue
:::::: How is Jinx correct with that example, though? The current living species of coelacanth are not the same as the ones in fossils, which as far as we know are all extinct (although the most recent fossils do resemble the living ones found). It seems that 'modern' coelacanth are substantially larger than their ancestors, and live birth is also speculated to be (relatively) new to the species. [[User:Wandering|Wandering]] 14:27, 26 June 2008 (EDT)
:::::: How is Jinx correct with that example, though? The current living species of coelacanth are not the same as the ones in fossils, which as far as we know are all extinct (although the most recent fossils do resemble the living ones found). It seems that 'modern' coelacanth are substantially larger than their ancestors, and live birth is also speculated to be (relatively) new to the species. [[User:Wandering|Wandering]] 14:27, 26 June 2008 (EDT)
::::: Jinxmchue, you need to do some research. Modern coelacanths are anything but unchanged. For example, they're roughly three times as large as their ancient predecessors. Of the two known living species, neither are in the same genus as ancient coelacanths. Your statement is ''blatantly'' false. --[[User:Rspeed|Rspeed]] 16:31, 26 June 2008 (EDT)
==Peer Review Process==
==Peer Review Process==