282
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 41:
Line 41: + +
→Editing
==Editing==
==Editing==
Hello. You should, by now, understand that the POV of, say, [[Hollywood values]] is to denigrate the motion picture and television industries. Adding films that show that Hollywood ''at least'' recognizes how to make a movie that has strong [[conservative values]], might make a reader think that there is some redeeming value in Hollywood and its value system. Since we know this '''cannot''' be the case, (after all, something is ''either'' '''all good''' or '''all bad'''), the edits you made were outside the scope of the POV. [[User talk:MargeryCampbell|Marge]] 16:58, 26 June 2008 (EDT)
Hello. You should, by now, understand that the POV of, say, [[Hollywood values]] is to denigrate the motion picture and television industries. Adding films that show that Hollywood ''at least'' recognizes how to make a movie that has strong [[conservative values]], might make a reader think that there is some redeeming value in Hollywood and its value system. Since we know this '''cannot''' be the case, (after all, something is ''either'' '''all good''' or '''all bad'''), the edits you made were outside the scope of the POV. [[User talk:MargeryCampbell|Marge]] 16:58, 26 June 2008 (EDT)
:Thanks Marge, and having been here a few days now I believe what you say. There were some previous edits to the article pointing out that not everyone in Hollywood goes along with "Hollywood values", and I had hoped that pointing out similarly that not all Hollywood movies go along with "Hollywood values" would be valuable. [[User:Daphnea|Daphnea]] 17:02, 26 June 2008 (EDT)