17
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1,130:
Line 1,130: +
Conservapedia talk:Lenski dialog (view source)
Revision as of 22:49, June 26, 2008
, 22:49, June 26, 2008→Anyone a biologist?
Here, I will put it back:
Here, I will put it back:
Editors who have expertise in certain areas are banned if the powers that be at Conservapedia disagree with them. A couple examples that come to mind. One is PalMD, a physician (and who provided his credentials), who attempted to correct the misinformation in Conservapedia's article linking abortion to breast cancer. Another is the historian "franklin" who contested much of the misinformation on the debate page regarding Franklin's deist leanings. You should read that debate page Bugler. You will notice that the person arguing with Franklin kept asking for views on "school prayer" as if that had something to do with the topic. But it does make my point that Conservapedia does not encourage experts to stay, but activly seeks to drive them away.--[[User:Fernandez|Fernandez]] 14:34, 26 June 2008 (EDT)--[[User:Thompson|Thompson]] 14:55, 26 June 2008 (EDT)--[[User:Watwood|Watwood]] 16:13, 26 June 2008 (EDT)
Editors who have expertise in certain areas are banned if the powers that be at Conservapedia disagree with them. A couple examples that come to mind. One is PalMD, a physician (and who provided his credentials), who attempted to correct the misinformation in Conservapedia's article linking abortion to breast cancer. Another is the historian "franklin" who contested much of the misinformation on the debate page regarding Franklin's deist leanings. You should read that debate page Bugler. You will notice that the person arguing with Franklin kept asking for views on "school prayer" as if that had something to do with the topic. But it does make my point that Conservapedia does not encourage experts to stay, but activly seeks to drive them away.--[[User:Fernandez|Fernandez]] 14:34, 26 June 2008 (EDT)--[[User:Thompson|Thompson]] 14:55, 26 June 2008 (EDT)--[[User:Watwood|Watwood]] 16:13, 26 June 2008 (EDT)
:: And there is, of course, the smearing of Dawkins by this site (which persists to this day) manifest in a painfully convoluted and clearly erroneous characterization of the proper use of the title "professor." A characterization that I'll note that is solely applied to Dawkins . . . I'll take my block now. [[User:AndyMann|AndyMann]] 18:49, 26 June 2008 (EDT)
== Attitude? ==
== Attitude? ==