Changes

: For one thing, there's not much point in blocking someone who has the ability to unblock themselves.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 09:24, 26 June 2008 (EDT)

: For one thing, there's not much point in blocking someone who has the ability to unblock themselves.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 09:24, 26 June 2008 (EDT)

Really, starting a conversation with "I will post your reply, or lack thereof" then maintaining that one only wants to participate in a scientific conversation and is chiefly concerned with freedom of information is hypocritical to say the very least.  As someone who can't be blocked, he has clearly set the standard for conservapedia.  Also, others on this thread have tendered obvious insults yet enjoyed no admonitions - again so long as they insult Lenski.  Isn't there something in the 'conservapedia commandments' about double standards?

Really, starting a conversation with "I will post your reply, or lack thereof" then maintaining that one only wants to participate in a scientific conversation and is chiefly concerned with freedom of information is hypocritical to say the very least.  As someone who can't be blocked, he has clearly set the standard for conservapedia.  Also, others on this thread have tendered obvious insults yet enjoyed no admonitions - again so long as they insult Lenski.  Isn't there something in the 'conservapedia commandments' about double standards? {{unsigned|Bithead}}

==Question==

==Question==