Changes

: One-sided and opinionated examples of alleged deceit by a president or corporation do not have sufficient quality to be included in this high-quality entry, which typically consisted of significant, prolonged, embraced and admitted or proven deceit.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 12:58, 27 June 2008 (EDT)

: One-sided and opinionated examples of alleged deceit by a president or corporation do not have sufficient quality to be included in this high-quality entry, which typically consisted of significant, prolonged, embraced and admitted or proven deceit.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 12:58, 27 June 2008 (EDT)

::I think Nixon's deceit was significant and prolonged.  Libby was significant simply for being a high-profile person, and his deceit was prolonged.  And Enron's deceit was very significant, costing hundreds of people their savings.  All three had their deceit proven in one way or another.  It's pretty deceitful to claim otherwise.  [[User:ZTak|ZTak]] 13:03, 27 June 2008 (EDT)

::I think Nixon's deceit was significant and prolonged.  Libby was significant simply for being a high-profile person, and his deceit was prolonged.  And Enron's deceit was very significant, costing hundreds of people their savings.  All three had their deceit proven in one way or another.  It's pretty deceitful to claim otherwise.  [[User:ZTak|ZTak]] 13:03, 27 June 2008 (EDT)