Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Reply to Aziraphale
Line 139: Line 139:     
(unindent) Rather than dispute this with you YET AGAIN, can we wait until you respond to criticisms of your position on other websites first? You keep repeating this "no straight answers" argument, and people keep pointing out your error, and you've yet to see this argument through to the end anywhere. Conservapedia is already struggling to maintain its current signal-to-noise ratio, please stop forum-shopping here. [[User:Aziraphale|Aziraphale]] 14:17, 27 June 2008 (EDT) ''<-knows where all the good sales are...''
 
(unindent) Rather than dispute this with you YET AGAIN, can we wait until you respond to criticisms of your position on other websites first? You keep repeating this "no straight answers" argument, and people keep pointing out your error, and you've yet to see this argument through to the end anywhere. Conservapedia is already struggling to maintain its current signal-to-noise ratio, please stop forum-shopping here. [[User:Aziraphale|Aziraphale]] 14:17, 27 June 2008 (EDT) ''<-knows where all the good sales are...''
 +
 +
:: Aziraphale said,  ''"Rather than dispute this with you YET AGAIN, can we wait until you respond to criticisms of your position on other websites first? "''    I have already spent a helluva lot of time responding to those criticisms on Carl Zimmer's blog and my own blog!  (see links in my first comment on this talk page)  But I have been kicked off of Carl Zimmer's blog,  and my own blog gets only about 50 visits per day.    In contrast,  this talk page is getting thousands of visits per day,  so it is obviously a much better forum for publicizing my views.
 +
 +
::''"You keep repeating this 'no straight answers' argument, and people keep pointing out your error."''  And I keep pointing out the errors in arguments that attempt to point out my alleged error.[[User:LarryFarma|LarryFarma]] 16:18, 27 June 2008 (EDT)
    
== removal of content from this page removes context of Lenski's second reply ==
 
== removal of content from this page removes context of Lenski's second reply ==
20

edits

Navigation menu