543
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 104:
Line 104: + +
Conservapedia talk:Lenski dialog (view source)
Revision as of 02:34, June 28, 2008
, 02:34, June 28, 2008''That's spelled "publicly", not "publically"
:::::: Your sermon is misplaced. Taxpayers paid for the Lenski's study, and any real scientist should reject the inexplicable withholding the data underlying its conclusions.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:22, 27 June 2008 (EDT)
:::::: Your sermon is misplaced. Taxpayers paid for the Lenski's study, and any real scientist should reject the inexplicable withholding the data underlying its conclusions.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:22, 27 June 2008 (EDT)
:::::::''That's spelled "publicly", not "publically"'' Right...and your edit above reads "the Lenski's study." Trying to score points based on typos makes it look like you're grasping at straws. [[User:AliceBG|AliceBG]] 22:34, 27 June 2008 (EDT)
::::::: Any "real" scientist can read the data from the paper and see that no data has been withheld. Just because you can't understand that the paper represents reams of data, doesn't mean you can summarily dismiss (and conclude that all "real" scientists should dismiss it as well) the paper on the basis that data has been withheld. As for Argon's "sermon", he addresses all of the points that have been made by others in a logical manner. I don't see how it is "displaced".-- [[User:Aaronp|Aaron]]
::::::: Any "real" scientist can read the data from the paper and see that no data has been withheld. Just because you can't understand that the paper represents reams of data, doesn't mean you can summarily dismiss (and conclude that all "real" scientists should dismiss it as well) the paper on the basis that data has been withheld. As for Argon's "sermon", he addresses all of the points that have been made by others in a logical manner. I don't see how it is "displaced".-- [[User:Aaronp|Aaron]]