nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
902
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 167:
Line 167: + +
Conservapedia talk:Lenski dialog (view source)
Revision as of 15:27, June 28, 2008
, 15:27, June 28, 2008→More replies to archived comments: good point, not necessarily contradictory, but "evidence" is just speculating
:::::The problem is that, if it can "very rarely" happen "by chance," then the premise that mutations do not produce new genetic information is simply false. Instead, we're faced with a debate over ''how frequently'' mutations produce new genetic information. --[[User:Benp|Benp]] 10:41, 28 June 2008 (EDT)
:::::The problem is that, if it can "very rarely" happen "by chance," then the premise that mutations do not produce new genetic information is simply false. Instead, we're faced with a debate over ''how frequently'' mutations produce new genetic information. --[[User:Benp|Benp]] 10:41, 28 June 2008 (EDT)
Philip, I see your point about how the creation of new information through mutation does not necessarily contradict creationism at all. However, it hardly seems like evidence ''for'' it; and extrapolating as you did (trying to claim the timeframe for these bacteria applies equally to the supposed evolution of humans) honestly seems like mostly speculation... [[User:Feebasfactor|Feebasfactor]] 11:27, 28 June 2008 (EDT)
==Lead author won't answer simple, basic questions==
==Lead author won't answer simple, basic questions==