Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 268: Line 268:  
:::::::::Reading Lenski's recent paper for comprehension reveals that the hypothesis being tested is that development of the Cit+ strain is a historically contingent process (that is, arising by multiple steps separated over time). The null hypothesis (not supported by the results of the experiments) is that the Cit+ strain arises by a single, exceptionally rare event.--[[User:Brossa|Brossa]] 10:52, 29 June 2008 (EDT)
 
:::::::::Reading Lenski's recent paper for comprehension reveals that the hypothesis being tested is that development of the Cit+ strain is a historically contingent process (that is, arising by multiple steps separated over time). The null hypothesis (not supported by the results of the experiments) is that the Cit+ strain arises by a single, exceptionally rare event.--[[User:Brossa|Brossa]] 10:52, 29 June 2008 (EDT)
 
:::::::''"I'm sorry, I thought you were asking for help."''    You call that "help"?  All you did was clutter up this talk page with your irrelevant "hypothesis" idea.  With friends like you,  who needs enemies? [[User:LarryFarma|LarryFarma]] 10:34, 29 June 2008 (EDT)
 
:::::::''"I'm sorry, I thought you were asking for help."''    You call that "help"?  All you did was clutter up this talk page with your irrelevant "hypothesis" idea.  With friends like you,  who needs enemies? [[User:LarryFarma|LarryFarma]] 10:34, 29 June 2008 (EDT)
 +
::::::::When did I call it help? I said that I thought you were asking for it. In any event Brossa seems to have clarified the situation.--[[User:British_cons|British_cons]] [[User_talk:British_cons|(talk)]] 11:38, 29 June 2008 (EDT)
    
== removal of content from this page removes context of Lenski's second reply ==
 
== removal of content from this page removes context of Lenski's second reply ==
444

edits

Navigation menu