89
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 5:
Line 5: + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
→Listing fields: new section
:Okay, I've moved it. I've also cut it from this page for economy's sake. [[User talk:MargeryCampbell|Marge]] 13:07, 28 June 2008 (EDT)
:Okay, I've moved it. I've also cut it from this page for economy's sake. [[User talk:MargeryCampbell|Marge]] 13:07, 28 June 2008 (EDT)
::Actually it makes the article look amaturish. For starters you have written in capitals and you have not explained why the missing data is significant which is the point of the side-by-side template to do a full rebuttle. [[User:DanielB|DanielB]] 19:44, 28 June 2008 (EDT)
::Actually it makes the article look amaturish. For starters you have written in capitals and you have not explained why the missing data is significant which is the point of the side-by-side template to do a full rebuttle. [[User:DanielB|DanielB]] 19:44, 28 June 2008 (EDT)
== Listing fields ==
I'm not a parodist, though I did make a mistake on what a CV is.
On the other hand, after doing some research, I don't think it's standard for faculty to put degree fields in a list of their degrees.
I googled "MSU biology", then went over the "Faculty List A-G". Here is what I found:
No list of degrees: 2
List with fields: 3
List without fields: 12
Finally, Oberlin is a liberal college, and they do focus mostly on liberal arts. [[User:Drochld|Drochld]] 14:26, 29 June 2008 (EDT)