Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 43: Line 43:     
::: The only way to prohibit displays of the 10 commandments would be for congress to make a law against them.  This is prohibited by the free exercise clause:  "Congress shall make no law...prohibiting the free exercise [Of Religion.]"  The only reason ever given for prohibiting government officials from having displays of the 10 commandments is that it violates the establishment clause of the first ammendment:  "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion..." There is nothing in the establishment clause that prohibits officials from having displays.  People say that there is a "Seperation of Church and State," in the first ammendment, but that is not true.  The establishment clause was put in to prevent the government from establishing a state religion. (like the Church of England) --[[User:TimSvendsen|TimSvendsen]] 15:28, 7 February 2007 (EST)
 
::: The only way to prohibit displays of the 10 commandments would be for congress to make a law against them.  This is prohibited by the free exercise clause:  "Congress shall make no law...prohibiting the free exercise [Of Religion.]"  The only reason ever given for prohibiting government officials from having displays of the 10 commandments is that it violates the establishment clause of the first ammendment:  "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion..." There is nothing in the establishment clause that prohibits officials from having displays.  People say that there is a "Seperation of Church and State," in the first ammendment, but that is not true.  The establishment clause was put in to prevent the government from establishing a state religion. (like the Church of England) --[[User:TimSvendsen|TimSvendsen]] 15:28, 7 February 2007 (EST)
 +
 +
REPLY: We need to be clear, that although the Constitution does not use the PHRASE "Separation of Church and State," it may contain the IDEA. The writings of Thomas Jefferson (Letter to the Danbury Baptists) and of James Madison, in particular, indicate that a separation of Church and State is EXACTLY what was intended by the 1st Amendment.
    
::::::People also say there's "separation of powers" and "checks and balances" in the Constitution, but gosh darn it, I can't seem to find those words anywhere! Does that mean that those, too, are invalid?  A public display of the 10 Commandments, on public/government property, is a violation of the 1st Amendment in that it implies that one religion (in this case any one of a number of Christian denominations) is endorsed and valued more highly than any other by government.  Government should remain neutral to religion, and the 10 Commandments are certainly not a religiously neutral document.
 
::::::People also say there's "separation of powers" and "checks and balances" in the Constitution, but gosh darn it, I can't seem to find those words anywhere! Does that mean that those, too, are invalid?  A public display of the 10 Commandments, on public/government property, is a violation of the 1st Amendment in that it implies that one religion (in this case any one of a number of Christian denominations) is endorsed and valued more highly than any other by government.  Government should remain neutral to religion, and the 10 Commandments are certainly not a religiously neutral document.
43

edits

Navigation menu